How the Copenhagen Climate Treaty Affects Your Health

Image provided by Takver
Governmental representatives from over 100 countries had finally finished debating in Copenhagen over the issue of global warming. According to the Agence France Presse the conference was a failure. You can read more about it here. To say that this conference was a failure may not be the best answer because this conference was doomed to fail in the first place. The main topic of discussion during the 2009 Copenhagen climate conference was about how carbon dioxide (CO2) was affecting the climate which can affect our health. Using CO2 to back up their global warming claims was the reason why the conference was a failure because man-made CO2 isn’t the main cause of global warming. There are many gases that can trap heat better than CO2; methane gas is one of them, it can trap 20 times more heat. CO2 is a chemical compound that is produced by burning things, such as oil, wood and natural gas. People and animals also produced it when they exhale. CO2 is necessary for plant life because plant needs it to produce sugar during photosynthesis. Without it plant won’t be able to survive.

During the Copenhagen conference there were some countries that were skeptical about the effects of man-made CO2. This was probably a good thing because the scientific evidences supporting the relationship between CO2 and global warming weren’t very compelling. When we step back and look at global warming from different perspectives, it becomes clear that man-made CO2 isn’t the main cause of global warming. For example, if CO2 is the main cause of global warming, then why are all the other planets heating up and becoming brighter? This information is public knowledge and is even surprisingly supported by NASA. Mainstream scientists don’t like to answer this question because it is very contradicting to their work, and if proven wrong, they will lose government funding.

Copenhagen climate treaty and your health

The people who are behind this global warming scandal are in it for profit and control, not for helping the planet. Some of them are even trying to provoke fear by saying that CO2 is a toxic gas. Because of their hidden agendas, if they succeeded, the people of Earth will suffer from many CO2 regulations. Worst of all, there would probably be a mandatory worldwide carbon tax on all commercial and non-commercial properties because many of them produce CO2. If this is allowed, many businesses would fail such as the health industry, the middle class would be in danger of collapsing, and third world countries would fall deeper into poverty. The current level of CO2 in the atmosphere is about 380 parts per million (ppm). According to researchers, CO2 isn’t harmful until it reaches about 3,000 ppm. Therefore, we still have a long way to go before it becomes a health problem. If world leaders were so concerned about the health of our planet, they should pay more attention to oxygen level because it is more of a threat to our survival. If countries don’t stop destroying nature, within half a century the Earth wouldn’t be able to support life because of oxygen depletion.

Ways to solve the global warming problem

The solutions for global warming suggested during the Copenhagen climate conference weren’t very effective and wouldn’t solve the global warming problem. If world leaders and energy corporations want to solve the global warming problem, they will need to do more studies on how nature affects climate, because global warming is a natural phenomenon, not man-made. They will also need to support and motivate scientists to study how the sun and water vapor affect global warming, because they are the two major contributors to global warming. If world leaders want to dramatically cut CO2 levels, they will need to support the new energy movement, such as magnetic energy, cold fusion and zero-point energy. If done correctly, through the use of advanced technologies, these cheap energy solutions will dramatically cut man-made CO2 levels, air pollution, and best of all poverty. Imagine living in a world where your electricity bill cost less than a few dollars per month. This is the type of benefits that will come along with these technologies. Also, this will dramatically reduce the price of food and everything else. The main reason why most world leaders don’t support the new energy movement is because many of them are heavily paid by energy corporations to keep their mouth shut. Energy corporations don’t want these technologies to come out because they are threats to their existence. If the public ever get their hands on these technologies, they will lose power and control over the public. Fortunately, there are some world leaders who are tired of this game of deception and are starting to support the new energy movement.

Weather controlling technologies can also be another solution for global warming. The problem with these technologies is that they are usually designed for military purposes. One weather controlling technology that is being tested and used is HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program), which is a radiowave-beaming technology that can be used to control the upper atmosphere, such as the ionosphere. Because of our lack of understanding the natural climate process, using weather controlling technologies may have negative consequences. For more information about HAARP please visit this page.

Related Posts:

• Global Warming Causes and Effects
• Magnetic Motor: Cheap Energy No Pollution